<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Tooling on Lucent</title><link>https://simple-is-awesome.github.io/hugo-theme-lucent/tags/tooling/</link><description>Recent content in Tooling on Lucent</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2026 16:00:00 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://simple-is-awesome.github.io/hugo-theme-lucent/tags/tooling/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Choosing a Static Site Generator in 2026</title><link>https://simple-is-awesome.github.io/hugo-theme-lucent/posts/choosing-a-static-site-generator/</link><pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2026 16:00:00 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://simple-is-awesome.github.io/hugo-theme-lucent/posts/choosing-a-static-site-generator/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Every static site generator comparison ends the same way: they&amp;rsquo;re all fine,
and the author picks the one they already knew. Let me save you the reading.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="the-actual-questions"&gt;The actual questions&lt;a class="heading-anchor" href="#the-actual-questions" aria-label="Link to this section"&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;How fast do you want builds?&lt;/strong&gt; If your site will grow past a few hundred
pages, build time becomes a feedback-loop tax. Hugo and Zola build thousands
of pages per second; JavaScript-based generators are getting closer but
still trail by an order of magnitude.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>